A Statute is nothing more than “A Legislated Rule of a Society” - canadian government conspiracies

Canadian Bill of Rights
Go to content

Main menu:

A Statute is nothing more than “A Legislated Rule of a Society”

Government > Canadian Democratic Society
 
Posted Monday, January 22, 2018
 
If the above title caught your attention, you should also see Canada, the true judicial structure!

A Statute is nothing more than “A Legislated Rule of a Society”

Remember if you do not what your natural inalienable rights are and how to protect them all you have is your society’s civil rights granted by big brother

Individuals who become Members of any society created under the constitution must have applied knowingly or unknowingly to be an enumerated class of subject/ contracted member without duress, and without deception. If you joined of your own free will you bound by the Society’s Legislated Rules and courts.

Whether you joined under your own free will or not, you can resign at any time, without recriminations.

When you must do, whatever the government wants you to do be suspicious.

You must appear in any court your first question should be about the court having any jurisdiction over you.

You must sign your income tax return to be subject to the income tax act and the tax court. According to the income tax act it cannot be universally applied so the government needs your consent.

You must sign your driver’s license to be subject to …. and the associated traffic court. If your driver’s license has expired or you do not have one, they need your consent when they subject you to that driving without a valid license none sense and the associated traffic court.

You are free to get married under common law but as soon as you sign the marriage license that is not required to marry, you are subject to all the associated rules and their divorce courts. Now you know why not having that piece of paper is so important to the government.

You must be a member of their society for child services to have a legal leg to stand on.

And the list goes on!

But...

Before government attempts to apply any of a Society’s Legislated Rules, it must be shown that:
A.    The Society who’s Legislated Rules are being imposed, has a distinct Name.
B.    The Society has published its “common goals”;
C.    The individual had joined under said individual’s own free will, without any duress imposed, and without any deception imposed. By this means the Member has decided to TRUST the Society, and has CONSENTED to the AUTHORITY of the Society’s Disciplinary Body e.g. a Court;
D.    The individual has not resigned, and remains a current Member in good standing. Remembering you can resign at any time, without recriminations and simply challenge their claimed jurisdiction

If it is not possible for the government to show (A) through (D), above, and action is taken against an individual, then such action is a CRIMINAL TRESPASS upon said individual’s SOVEREIGNTY, and an abuse of said individual’s Natural, Inalienable, Rights – under the Common Law of the Land.

And this must apply equally to all individuals without fear or favour, because everyone is equal under the Common Law of the Land.

If you are having any kind of trouble with these concepts, they are easily resolved. Just consider any Solicitor and your Doctor.
All Solicitors consented, of his or her own free will, to be bound by the Rules & Regulations of the Law Society, when he or she studied and became one.

Your Doctor consented, of his or her own free will, to be bound by the Rules & Regulations of the Medical Association when he or she studied and became one.

Trying to apply the Rules & Regulations of the MA to your Solicitor is not possible. He or she will say: “The Hippocratic Oath, and those Rules don’t apply to me … I’m not a Doctor, and only bound by the Rules & Regulations of the Law Society”. (And the Common Law, of course … but they forget that).

Trying to apply the Rules & Regulations of the Law Society to your Doctor is not possible. He or she will say: “The Law Society’s Rules & Regulations don’t apply to me. I’m not a Lawyer, I’m a Doctor. I’m only bound by my Hippocratic Oath, and the Rules & Regulations of the MA”. (And the Common Law, of course … but they forget that).

Unless, and until, it can be shown that one has consented to obey ANY set of Rules & Regulations, by one’s own free will, not under duress, or any kind of deception, ANY and ALL so-called ‘Disciplinary action’ is disreputable, despicable, and dishonourable. Because the ‘Disciplinary Body’ has not been given any AUTHORITY to do so. And those who perpetrate this kind of activity are simply CRIMINALS – in the true and absolute sense of that word.

This applies to any government statutes as much as to any other Society. The only ‘law’ that does not require ‘consent’ is the Common Law, the Law-of-the-Land.



See latest “Recent Revisions” above
Copyright 2015-2017 - all Human Rights Reserved
Blog
Back to content | Back to main menu