Since 1990 until 2015 there were 496 Revised Statutes of British Columbia, 490 in 1996 [see below]! So what happened in 1996?
In the webmasters opinion it originated back in 1992 when the Americans ratified the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights while reserving the right not to make s1 - s27 self-executing! See eternallyaware <https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CJhKjMU7RcA> for more!
Since the Justice Department formalized its “credible argument” interpretation of the law in 1993 [see “The whistleblower” < http://www.canadiangovernmentconspiracies.com/the-whistleblower.html >], there has not been a single instance in which the Justice Minister has advised Parliament that a law is not consistent with the Charter since no rights in Canada have been self-executing here either! [see Suewrongdoers.com
It took the government in Canada years most likely to rewrite all the important legislation at that time to reflect that new position based on that new “credible argument” interpretation of the law.
Here in BC it apparently took 3 years to rewrite all the important legislation at that time to reflect that new position.
The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms
Guarantee of Rights and Freedoms
Section 1. The Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms guarantees the rights and freedoms set out in it subject only to such reasonable limits prescribed by law as can be demonstrably justified in a free and democratic society.
Application of Charter
Section 32 1. This Charter applies
a. to the Parliament and government of Canada in respect of all matter within the authority of Parliament including all matters relating to the Yukon Territory and Northwest Territories; and
b. to the legislature and government of each province in respect of all matters within the authority of the legislature of each province.
The purpose of this section is to make it clear that the Charter only applies to governments, and not to private individuals, businesses or other organizations.
Mixed in with all the Revised Statutes of British Columbia in 1996 was this one gem that has been found so far“Society Act, RSBC 1996, c 433 <http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/96433_01#section74>
Part 7 — Conversion of a Society
Conversion to company
74 (1) Subject to subsection (2), a society may, with the consent of the registrar and in accordance with the regulations, be converted to a company and, for that purpose, the following provisions of the Business Corporations Act <http://www.bclaws.ca/Recon/document/ID/freeside/02057_00> apply to the society as if it were a special Act corporation within the meaning of that Act:
(a) section 266 except
(i) in subsection (1), the words "if it has the consent of the minister to do so, and", and
(ii) subsections (3) (b) and (6);
(b) sections 267 and 268.
(2) This section does not apply to a society with a charitable purpose referred to in section 134 (3) of this Act.
Pretty slick hey? The democratic society becomes a company and that business, according to the Charter s32, is no longer subject to the charter, and that “credible argument” interpretation of the law is clear to pass anything when protecting our rights are no longer of any concern. Now the government is regulated like any other for Profit Company, except for the kangaroo courts, armed thugs willing to kill for a company pay cheque and the ability to write the regulations that it must follow, of course!
Like any other company that violated your rights it is you that has to defend them against that violation!
And you thought the government was violating your rights! Shame on you! The onus is on the government to know your rights and make that information available to you but the government can’t force you to learn them.
There is one problem left that the new corporations laughingly referred to as the executive branch of government [see PROVINCE OF BRITISH COLUMBIA (0000836136) <http://www.canadiangovernmentconspiracies.com/province-of-british-columbia--0000836136-.html >] have left to deal with and that is the supremacy of the Constitution Act section 52. Those pesky international covenants are still a problem here in Canada, a problem that the American government avoided by conditionally accepting the covenants.
So if you have a claim against the government for rights violations and damages it is against the provincial or federal corporation! Your best chance is not to use any of the Revised Statutes/internal operating procedures masquerading as laws.
The webmaster expects that people in other jurisdictions will also find the same thing has taken place in their jurisdiction.